How do you measure AI support success beyond deflection rate?

I

Imani Brooks

CX analysts

6d

I am trying to get a realistic read on how do you measure AI support success beyond deflection rate.

Include CSAT, reopen rate, complaint themes, saved agent time, and revenue risk.

What has actually worked (or failed) for your team? Specific examples, pricing traps, or vendor claims that did not hold up are especially useful.

441views6replies
L

Leo Park

Customer success lead

5d

Source quality beat model size for us. Clean knowledge + tool scopes fixed more hallucinations than switching models.

M

Mila Chen

Operations lead

4d

Start with one bounded workflow that has a clear success metric. We tried to automate three use cases at once and none of them got good enough to ship.

F

Felix Kron

RevOps practitioner

3d

The vendor demo is not the product. Ask to see the same workflow run on your data, not their sample data. That is where connector gaps and permission issues show up.

H

Hana Ishikawa

Research analyst

3d

Measure rework, not just throughput. An agent that resolves 80% of cases but creates 30% more manual cleanup is not saving time.

O

Omar Farouk

Buyer consultant

2d

We learned the hard way that 'human in the loop' is not a checkbox. If the approval UI is buried or slow, reviewers will batch-approve without reading.

L

Luna Berg

RevOps practitioner

20h

Security questions should be part of the first demo, not a procurement afterthought. Ask about retention, sub processors, prompt-injection testing, and audit logs before you waste time on a trial.